|
|
Introduction Our school is committed to developing a strong sense of
partnership with parents/carers and other
members of the local community. This provides a good basis for understanding and
resolution when things appear to go wrong. This policy describes the procedure to be followed when
complaints are made by parents/carers and others about the conduct of the school or the actions of any member
of staff. It is in line with the recommendations in the
The procedure excludes complaints relating to the
school’s delivery of the National Curriculum. The procedure for curriculum
complaints is summarised in the
leaflet Complaints about the School Curriculum, which has been written
specifically for governors and parents/carers. Copies of this are available to
parents/carers and
governors from the school or the Education, Libraries and Heritage Department. What Constitutes a Complaint in our
Procedure?
We accept the Local Government Ombudsman's definition
of a complaint, which when applied to a school, covers the following areas: "A
complaint is an expression of dissatisfaction, however made, about the standard
of service, actions, or lack of actions, by a school or its staff affecting an
individual or a group." Members of the public, parents/carers and
pupils/students may legitimately express dissatisfaction about aspects of our
work. Why have we adopted a general
Complaints Procedure?
All maintained schools are required to have in place a
complaints procedure. We hope that ours will help to ensure that most complaints
are resolved quickly and smoothly and as close to the source of the
misunderstanding or problem as possible. In this way complainants can feel
assured from the outset of a fair hearing, in line with a defined procedure for
dealing with issues that have not immediately been resolved. We also hope that a
staged framework might prevent an early and unnecessary escalation of the
problem. In addition, we will ensure that lessons learned from the investigation of
complaints will prove useful to improve the school’s policy and practice. The Policy’s Guiding PrinciplesOur Complaints Procedure: ·
Is simple
to understand and use – with straightforward, well
publicised stages; ·
Encourages
resolution of problems by informal means wherever possible; ·
Is easily
accessible and publicised – with complainants knowing exactly where, how and
to whom they should complain; ·
Enables
swift handling within established time-limits – with complaints being dealt
with promptly, effectively and professionally within stated time limits at as
early a stage as possible and with complainants being kept informed of progress;
The Policy’s
Guiding Principles continued…
·
Enables
effective action – with action being agreed and reviewed and complainants
being kept informed of progress throughout each stage of the procedure; ·
Is
impartial, ensuring a full and fair investigation by an independent person where
necessary – with an assurance that, beyond the first informal stage of
investigation of a complaint against an individual, the subject of the complaint
will not deal with it but will instead refer it to his or her manager or Chair
of Governors where appropriate; ·
Is
non-adversarial – with opportunities provided for resolution without conflict; ·
Is
confidential – with respect for people’s desire for confidentiality; ·
Addresses
all the points at issue – with provision of an effective response ·
Provides
information and enables development – providing information, where
appropriate, to the school’s senior management team and giving opportunities
for the school to consider changes to current practice on the basis of what
complainants are saying. Those involved in the complaints process will ensure
that it takes place in the context of the requirements of Child Protection,
Special Educational Needs and other relevant procedures. Our Procedure for Handling ComplaintsResponse StandardsWe believe that most complaints can be resolved
satisfactorily by informal discussion either over the telephone or through a
meeting involving the key people involved. We will normally acknowledge
complaints within five working days. We will also normally provide a response
or, if a lengthy investigation is involved, an update on progress, within twenty
working school days. In the case of a lengthy investigation complainants
will be kept informed of progress. The main aim throughout the procedure is to resolve the
matter as quickly and effectively as possible, to everybody's satisfaction. Stage 1 : Informal Complaints·
Parents/carers
and others should raise complaints or concerns with the child's Classteacher. ·
If a parent
believes that the complaint or concern is serious or sensitive she/he should
talk to the Key Stage Manager who then reports back either in writing or more
usually at this informal stage, through an interview with the complainant. ·
If the
complaint or concern is not able to be resolved by the relevant Key Stage
Manager a parent/carer may take their complaint or concern to the Deputy
Headteacher or Headteacher. ·
All
colleagues involved in informal complaints should keep written records, and
should record the date on which the informal complaint was made. ·
Every
effort will always be made to resolve the problem at this informal stage,
including, possibly, the offer of a conciliation meeting. ·
Complainants who remain dissatisfied at this stage
will be informed that they have the opportunity to make a formal complaint. In
such cases, complainants will be required to state clearly in writing that they
are making a formal complaint. ·
Individual
complaints will not, at any stage, be heard by, or referred to, the whole
Governing Body, as this could compromise the impartiality of any appeal or any
disciplinary hearing against a member of staff following a serious complaint.
Stage Two : Formal Complaints·
When they
express an interest in making a formal complaint, parents will be given a copy
of the complaints leaflet and reminded of the twenty school working day time
limits included in the process. ·
Formal
complaints should be made in writing, should state clearly that a formal
complaint is being made and will normally be investigated, in the first
instance, by the Headteacher or designated senior manager. ·
If the
complaint directly concerns the Headteacher,
however, complainants should contact the Chair of Governors, who will consult
the school’s Assigned Inspector and then investigate the complaint. ·
Any other
governors in receipt of complaints will refer them to the
Headteacher or the Chair of Governors, as
appropriate, and will not become further involved themselves. ·
If the
complainant is dissatisfied with the Headteacher's response, s/he should contact
the Chair of Governors, who may consult with the School’s Assigned Inspector. ·
The Chair
of Governors will determine a method of further investigation and provide a
formal response to the complainant. The Assigned Inspector will normally be
available to advise the Chair of Governors over the investigation and the
response. ·
If the
Assigned Inspector considers that the complaint is complex or may have a legal
dimension, s/he will refer it through the appropriate Head of School
Effectiveness for possible support from an Education Officer. ·
If the
Chair of Governors feels that it would not be appropriate for him/her to
investigate the complaint, s/he may delegate the Vice-Chair of the Governing
Body or another governor to carry out the task and report confidentially to
him/her. In exceptional circumstances the Chair of Governors might request that
an Education Officer carry out the investigation.
·
If a
written complaint is received by the LEA, the school’s Assigned Inspector or
an Education Officer will consult with the Headteacher/Chair of Governors as
appropriate and determine a suitable method of investigation. The complaint will
then be dealt with following the complaints procedure. ·
The
complainant will receive a written response to his/her complaint. A meeting may
also be arranged. ·
If an
Education Officer has carried out an investigation on behalf of the Chair of
Governors, s/he will report in writing confidentially to the Chair of Governors.
The Chair will normally share the whole report with the complainant, bearing in
mind data protection requirements. ·
If an
Education Officer has carried out an investigation on behalf of the Chair of
Governors, the Chair will share his/her response to the complainant with that
officer and will inform the him/her a)
when the complainant has been contacted and
b) of the outcome. ·
Colleagues investigating
complaints should not visit complainants’ homes. Alternative venues should be
agreed. ·
In some
cases, a complaint may lead to disciplinary action against an individual, for
which there are separate procedures. If this is the case the complainant will be
informed that the complaint will be pursued through disciplinary action. Under
the Governing Body’s disciplinary procedures, the outcome of these
procedures is confidential. Complainants should normally receive a response to
their formal complaint within twenty school working days of the receipt of that
complaint. When receiving the results of an investigation into a
formal complaint carried out by/on behalf of the Chair of Governors,
complainants should be informed of their right to appeal and reminded that the
time limit for requesting an appeal hearing is twenty school working days from
the date of receiving feedback from the investigation.
Stage 3 : AppealIf they remain dissatisfied after an investigation
by/on behalf of the Chair of Governors, complainants may appeal to the Grievance
Panel/Hearings Committee of the Governing Body for a resolution of their
complaint. A model agenda and guidance for chairs of such hearings are available
from Education Officers. In serious cases, if invited by both parties, an
Education Officer will make every effort to attend the hearing, to act as
procedural adviser. The Committee will normally either: a)
dismiss the
complaint in whole or part or
b)
uphold the
complaint in whole or part. Appropriate recommendations may be made to
the Headteacher or Governing Body. The decision will be communicated in writing
to both sides, with reasons for the judgment given.
If the business of the appeal is not completed in one
session, the meeting will be adjourned and a date agreed to re-convene. A
reasonable date by which the appeal process will be closed will also be agreed
before adjournment. The appeal meeting should normally take place within
twenty school working days of receipt of the request. If,
at any point, the complainant, having exhausted the complaints procedure,
attempts to re-open the same complaint, s/he will be informed in writing that
the procedure has been exhausted and that the matter is now closed. If,
at any point, a complainant requests to proceed to the next stage of the
complaints procedure at a time past the twenty working school day time limit,
s/he will normally be told in writing that the complaint has expired. Complaints Against
Chairs of Governors
In
the event of a formal complaint being made against the Chair of Governors, the
complaint will be heard by the Grievance Panel/Hearings Committee. The
recommended procedure for Appeals Hearings will be adopted. Complainants will be
informed of the limited powers of such a committee in these circumstances: if
the complaint is upheld or upheld in part, the committee may make
recommendations to the Chair of Governors and the Governing Body. Complaints Against
Governors A formal complaint
against a governor other than the Chair should be referred to the Chair, who
will investigate and then decide on appropriate action. In extreme cases this
might include making a recommendation to the Governing Body about possible
suspension (See A Governor’s Guide to the Law).
APPENDIX
A
Sample
Form for Making a Formal Complaint
APPENDIX B Guidance for Chairs of Governors/Officers Conducting
Complaints Investigations 1)
Many complaints are detailed and complex. It is
recommended that the complainant be interviewed as the first step of the
investigation. This interview could take place by telephone. The objects will be
a) to enable the complainant to clarify the nature of the complaint and what
remains unresolved, b) to enable the complainant to explain details and c) to
enable the investigator to clarify/separate issues. The separation of individual
issues should enable each area to be addressed separately and appropriately.
2)
During this interview, the investigator should
a) inform the complainant that the person who is the subject of the
complaint will need to see a copy of the written complaint, and to obtain the
complainant’s permission for this in writing;
b) ask the complainant what would bring closure to the issue for him/her;
c) (If the complainant has unrealistic expectations of the process,)
clarify exactly what the possible outcomes of the complaints procedure could,
and could not, be; d) inform the
complainant of the expected timescale for the whole process;
e) conduct the interview with an open mind and be prepared to persist in
the questioning; f) keep notes of
the interview. 3)
At the end of this interview, the investigator should
agree with the complainant the issues that have been raised in the complaint. It
is recommended that the investigator then writes to the complainant with these
issues clearly specified, asking the complainant to sign to confirm/amend the
document. 4)
If an officer or another governor is carrying out the
investigation, s/he should inform the Chair of Governors of the expected
timescale. 5)
The investigator should carry out the inquiry as
quickly as possible, keeping written, dated records of interviews and other
processes. Those involved in the matter, and those complained of, should be
interviewed. All involved should be allowed to be accompanied if they wish. 6)
If undertaking the inquiry on behalf of the Chair of
Governors, the investigator should report confidentially in writing to the Chair
and discuss the most appropriate method of sharing the results with the
complainant. 7)
The investigator should bear in mind data protection
requirements and ensure that individuals are not named in the report or
identified in any other way. 8)
The investigator should consider making positive
recommendations. 9)
Normally, the entire report should be shared with the
complainant. If the investigation leads to recommendations of any disciplinary
procedures, no details of these may be given to the complainant. No personal
information about a third party can be disclosed without that person’s
consent. 10)
Sometimes
the initial sharing of the report is best achieved in a meeting with the
complainant. If an Education Officer or other officer has carried out the
investigation, s/he will make every effort to be available for this meeting if
requested by both sides. Sometimes the more appropriate time for a meeting is a
short period after the complainant has received the report. On occasions, no
such meeting will be necessary at all. 11)
It is
recommended that investigators do not visit complainants’ homes, and that
suitable alternative venues be agreed.
APPENDIX C Other
Guidance Available
The following additional guidance is available from Education
Officers: 1)
Guidance for complaints appeals panels 2)
Model agenda for appeals 3)
Appeals: suggested opening remarks by Chair Please contact: RICHARD GIBBONS
richard.gibbons@cambridgeshire.gov.uk
01223 717398 DAWN RAHMAN dawn.rahman@cambridgeshire.gov.uk
01223 717783 SAM MCLAUGHLIN
Samantha.mclaughlin@cambridgeshire.gov.uk
01223 712265 SANDRA LEE
Sandra.lee@cambridgeshire.gov.uk
01223 717127 |
|
Alderman Jacobs School cannot be held responsible for external links. Children should always be supervised when using the internet. |